Key Points presented by Philosophers in the 17th Century

IntroductionREALLY, should it non be the purpose of a political relation to work for the benefit of its subjects? The well-known American George Washington said that the joy of fellowship, that is, of the the great unwashed, is, or ought to be, the end the objective of wholly governing body. Over the centuries, clementkind has lived under hundreds of administrations. n bingle have truly satisfied the admits of all the people.Whatever the complaints made, however, the fact the Great Compromiser that some sort of government is clearly better than no government at all. Without government there would be no order it would be no less than riffraff rule. And if you have ever seen a mob in action you know what that would meanfor in a mob people take the opportunity to vent hatred, greed and viciousness, feeling that no one will identify them for punishment.However, despite of all the disappointments brought about by the gay government to the society through the threads of histor y, philosophers from the olden times up until the present era still believes that the compassionate society could non exist in an organized manner without the public of a concrete government in authority.In this regard, it is thus essential for the present extension to know the vitality of the philosophies presented by the 17th up until the 21st coke philosophers and how much important they atomic number 18 with regards to the political systems existing in the human beings society todayAmong the well-known philosophers to be discussed herein are Rene Descartes, Karl Marx, Thomas Hobbes Leviathan, nates Locke, Voltaire Candide, Jean Jacques Rousseau, and Montesquieu. These philosophers are most likely agreeing on one origin with regards to their belief of the present situation of the human society and tits quest of having a government to rule over its concerns. In this regard, an analysis would be very beneficial to understand the theories and philosophies formulated by t he people mentioned above.The PhilosophiesRene Descartes believes that in some ways, the human society is in dire need of a government to rule over its activities. tally to him, it is so by nature unlettered in military man that they are adequate to solve and face the challenges they are supposed to meet everyday. The fact that they are capable of speculating on the things that office happen through simple application of theories, humankind are indeed capable of solving complaisant issues they face. However, it is also evident in his doctrine that to be able to create the necessary solutions for certain problems, it is important for adult male to attain guidance from a higher sort of authority. This is where a government enters the scenario, which is ought to give guidance to the society on how they are supposed to trade in with the numerous problems that occur in the society every now and then.Karl Marx on the new(prenominal) end refers to governments as a source of so cial strength. In his philosophy on the communist manifesto, he states that the idea of communism to mystify socialism is an important promoter in economic aiding the human society to progress through their works. According to him, the factual effect of communism to many countries using the said type of government as a kernel of ruling the territories they organize. It is through this way of governance that the authorities are able to favor the abilities placed by the workers in contributing to the economy of the completed country.Still regarding politics, Thomas Hobbes Leviathan states in his philosophy that men, when left alone are infixedly lovers of violence. They are naturally involved in fights and chaos. However, an existing government intentional to table service the human generations deal with the conflicts they have against each other, then such(prenominal) conflicts are possible of being solved. The laws prepared and implicated by the human governments help so much in making it possible for the human society to be well organized thus giving humans the chance to control their emotions and reactions towards several conflicts that they are involved with.John Locke on the other hand agrees with the idea of Thomas Hobbes. He believes that through the existence of empiricism, the human civilization would become more organized. He states in his philosophy that the master(prenominal) goal of every government is to establish a certain level of organization at bottom the human society. Aside from this, it is indeed beneficial that the governments help the society to learn the needs and the essential actors contributed by law to the lives of the macrocosm of people making up the society. With this, cooperation between each subject within the territories ruled by the government could be established well.John Locke further adds that in many ways, a human government is able to emphasize the need for each person to pursue what they believe is true. Cert ainly, through the existence of tabula rasa, which refers to the natural rights of humans, the governments are able to deal with the problems caused by the social conflicts in a better and organized manner.Voltaire Candide meanwhile talks about the utopia of the human generation. According to him, the regular exercise of humans of their right to speak of their minds helps in making a better government. The ability of humans to speak out their minds and the rights that are connected with it constantly helps in making more reliable and applicatory laws and regulations for the society. Certainly, the constant practice of this right is believed by Candide to be a call source to social development.Jean Jacques Rousseau of the philosophy on Social Contract on the other hand makes a clear point in stating that humans are naturally good, however, because of the government and the environment around them, they become natural and are influenced to do otherwise than what is accepted good. T o him, government is a factor of the society that must be constantly controlled by the people since the people placed the government in authority. To him, the exercise of democracy is the key factor to social success.Regarding the existence of a democratic government, Montesquieu agrees that the present systems used by the European governments, having been able to divide the rulership or authoritative power into terce major sectors is among the most progressiveinnovation there ever was in the human government. In this regard, it is thus expected to be effective teeming in leading the human civilization to a progressive future.ConclusionA peaceful, wanton and happy world that is what people everywhere long for. Not that humility, but reality and honesty oblige us to admit that it is because all men are imperfect that they are not capable of transaction with the necessary needs of having a true reliable government. The fault lies, not just with those who rule, but also with those who are ruled. True, Instant communication and speedy transportation have shrunk the size of the world, so that there is an interlocking of interests, and no nation can be an isolated, totally independent unit. What happens in one place affects people everywhere else.Governments can make some pocket-size moves to adjust matters and make conditions a little better for the people. However, such help proves to be only superficial and temporary. As the philosophers discussed in this paper states, the existence of a fine government lies upon the capability of the people to cooperate and be in submission to the laws created by the authorities to attain a social Utopia.BIBLIOGRAPHYSteven M. Cahn. (1998). Classics of Political and Moral Philosophy.Oxford University Press, USA.