'Legal Systems\r'

'Rawls describes individual rights as, â€Å"rights representing the moral rights of individuals in troupe prior to government. Individual rights be principles that identify and support current interactions between individuals in a bon ton bandage excluding others,” (20) Different countries have different ways of guarding their citizens’ merciful rights. Governments that respect individual rights often supply for comprehensive controls that protect individual rights.\r\nThe Canadian engage of Rights and Freedoms is the bole that deals with the rights of Canadian citizens. The Charter is law and is vocalism of the Canadian constitution. Since the charter is law, the federal government so-and-so not easily make throws to it. It is also stronger than laws the provinces create. www.hrweb.org/.\r\nIt guarantees granting immunitys called fundamental freedoms; freedom of conscience and religion, freedom of thought, belief and expression, including freedom of al l media and other press. Freedom of peaceful hookup and freedom of association is also guaranteed.\r\nThese are the prefatory freedoms that the Canadian citizens share. However, the Charter allows for the limit of these freedoms chthonian certain circumstances like, restricting the freedom of assembly in time of war. To help a disadvantaged separate achieve equality, it allows differential treatment. The Chatter is to be interpret in way that preserves and enhances the multicultural inheritance of Canadians.\r\nThe fall in States constitution on human rights is rattling similar in content to the outlined Canadian individual rights apart from the some rights in the Canadian Charter can be overridden by governments if they designedly do so. This is not the case with the United States human being rights laws which cannot even be even removed only by a constitutional amendment as they are considered unchallengeable under the natural rights principles the reputation is founded upon.\r\nThe United States human rights laws, contrary British laws are relevant to e in truth(prenominal) unmatched in the country as a total and are not subject to small submit adherence. ‘Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms hardening forth herein,’ (Rawls 25).\r\nUnlike the British pitying Rights Constitution that is ready within the United Kingdom, United States do a universal declaration of its human rights trade vindication strategy.\r\n in the buff Zealand, which is a former colony of Britain in its human rights protection aims at developing harmonious relationships between individuals and achievement of equal employment opportunity.  New Zealand have accepted a very special right to cover on specific topics while primarily balancing privacy as one interest against security, commercial and political interests in disjointed legislation and tort law rulings, unlike  Britain, which has very complete rules on privacy rights of individuals. www.hrweb.org/\r\nBritain has a very complete and elaborate system in discourse human rights issues. It has an official  union that deals with human rights that is, the practice for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which has several protocols guarding human rights The protocols accepted vary from one state to another(prenominal) this is effective in reaching all targets as per their individual need.\r\nThese protocols include laws prohibiting death penalty, protection against torture, protection against slavery and forced labor with the exception of prison house labor and national services. To those protected by the collection of liberty and lawful arrest.\r\nBritain has also established a special court that deals with human rights violation, European solicit of Human Rights, where the court decision is legally screen and the court awards damages. Inter-state rights violation cases can also be taken to this court for states that are party ton that protocol. This provides the individual with immunity against abuse and special earreach of cases. The protocol outlines the procedures of a fair trial. Religion, marriage and privacy are also covered in the British human rights laws. The protocols also prohibit discrimination of whatsoever kind.\r\nThe amendment of the laws for human rights is also possible with the British system, unlike the American system where the law is protect under natural rights systems. The British laws are much much flexile to meet the needs of the time and change of priority. When protocols are introduced, they need to pass the universal verification before they come into force in stage to maintain the institutional unity of the Convention machinery.\r\n in spite of the British human rights protection strategies being just about simila r in content to the other countries, it is much elaborate and its administration being under its consume special court makes it be independent of the popular laws and normal courts jurisdiction. The application of the laws per state also gives the citizens a free choice when it comes to living by the set rules. Its amendments are also much more flexible to expansions and being managed by a special body and not politicians, it’s more effective in administration and management of issues.\r\nWork Cited\r\nRawls, John, A conjecture of Justice (Revised edition. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap                                         Press, 1999.\r\nâ€Å"Human Rights”1st July, 2007.Worldwide Human Rights Network.25th May, 2007                                Â  Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â www.hrweb.org/\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n'