Could the Atrocities in Rwanda have been Prevented or Minimized?

If more nations could score been more proactive, the atrocities could create been easily minimized. The UN helped to make out peace between the warring parties, but did not assort its peacekeepers to fire. Crack man from some other nations evacuated their fellow citizens, but desuffraged the Rwandans. These ar evidences of inaction. I guess that the U.N had to be more decisive to go bad the genocide. Either they intervene aggressively or they do not. If they had suppose that they were not willing to help, a false sense of security department system would not come been created among the Rwandans. Rwandans thought that the U.N would protect them from the reserves and and then were not well prepared to retaliate. The U.N could have pile the Rwandan genocidal piano tuner to prevent people from spreading hate. The U.N could have responded to the many tip-offs that they received. The U.N could have authorized the troops to kill to save. The U.N could have attribute diplomatic press on Rwanda; they could have put economic pressure on Rwanda. However, they chose to keep discussing and failed to take action. In my opinion the U.N is where exclusively nations go to cover for inaction. On the other hand, the U.N may have its avow springs for its inaction. The gage Council could either alter or remove its military presence in Rwanda.

They unconquerable to withdraw after most of its peacekeepers were killed by the militia. I believe the reason for withdrawal was because of the Statess vote for inaction in the Security Council. They suffered a drop in military morale when scenes of the ir troops being killed in Somalia were telev! ised. Apparently, America did necessity history to quote itself in Rwanda. Finally, I do not agree that the reason for inaction was due to racial reasons. As stated above, If you want to get a lavish essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper