Analysis Of Peter Fleming s Dead Man Working - 968 Words

Dead Man Working Carl Cederstorm and Peter Fleming have strong opinions regarding capitalism and how corporations are slowly taking over the world. Everyone is living in inequality and they don’t even know it. Corporations have so many things to distract everyone and make everyone apathetic about the real problems going on in society. We are living in a society where rich people keep getting richer and everyone else stays where they are. Corporations are demoralizing workers and turning them into a robot. For example, in a biographical essay by Rob Lucas, he talks about how even in his sleep, he is thinking about his work as a computer programmer. He calls this â€Å"sleep working† and says that he is always â€Å"dreaming up solutions to complex†¦show more content†¦The only way to not become a dead man working in society is to be dead. Privately owned corporations are taking over society and making workers’ lives meaningless, joyless, and hopeless. In other words, capitalism is turning everyone into dead men working. Workers today are people who exist between life and death because everyone lives in a â€Å"repetitive loop of work and consumption.† Workers no longer have a passion for what they do. Workers go to work to earn money, and then use that money to buy things for their kids or spend it on holidays. Jobs today tell you to be yourself, but in reality, they only say that to sou nd nice. As soon as you start the job, you have to transform into a whole another person to fit their criteria. That is why workers today are people between life and death. Workers are physically there, but they are all mentally gone. Capitalism had created the circumstances that maker worker’s lives so meaningless, joyless, and hopeless. Capitalism has turned workers into their job. It has transformed everyone from a person to a thing. Every worker is known by their job and is their job. Every worker adapts and loses their self-identity for a job. In our everyday life, we compensate many things to get over the sense of â€Å"death† or desperation. According to the text, â€Å"The things in life we could look forward to,

P.O.W.s in the Vietnam War Essay - 691 Words

P.O.W.s in the Vietnam War The Vietnam war, also called the Indochina War , may be said to have started in 1957 when Communist-led rebels began mounting terrorists attacks against the government of the Republic of Vietnam (South Vietnam). The rebel forces, commonly called the Vietcong, were later aided by troops of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam (North Vietnam). American combat personnel were formally committed to the defense of the South in 1965. An agreement calling for a ceasefire was signed in January 1973, and by March the few remaining U.S. millitary personnel in Vietnam were withdrawn. However, the war between the two Vietnamese sides persisted inconclusively for two additional years before South Vietnamese resistance†¦show more content†¦They would tie their hands with rope and turn a wheel that stretched their back. The worst part was coming off and getting the rope off of you. Soldiers were placed in handcuffs and leg irons and were left that way for sometimes many years. Mr. Ralph Gaith er was a navy ensign when his plane was shot down. He was immediately taken to one of the thirteen vietnamese prisons. He would spend the next seven to eight years of his life in an 4.5x9 cell with another man. From the cell he watched many of his friends lives get wasted, because they talked back to the Vietnamese. There was no love in these camps between the Americans and the Vietcong. Soldiers were told that they were not prisoners-of-war, but mere criminals. A war had not been declared by the United States Government so therefore they could treat their advisaries as murderers and thieves. The prisons that they were being held in were built by the French in the latter parts of the nineteenth century. The same times when the Geneva Accordance came around. This was the law on treatment of all foreign prisoners of war and civilians. It stated that humane treatment of civilians, prisoners, and wounded persons in wartime must be adhered to or a war crime indictment would be issued. Co lonel Bud Day whose f100 was shot down in Vietnam stated I was hung by my feet like a side of butchered beef for many hours because I refused to answer my captors questions. Beatings were uncontrollable and sometimes resulted in death.Show MoreRelatedThe Vietnam War And The United States872 Words   |  4 PagesThe Vietnam War was unlike any other war in which the United States has participated. The Vietnam War has many unique attributes, beginning with the unclear reason as to why the U.S. became involved in a war that presented no threat to U.S. citizens or national security. Three unique attributes of the Vietnam War that are very interesting are the U.S. combat strategy, the Vietnamese guerrilla warfare, and the MIA issue. The first interesting attribute is the combat strategy used by the American soldiersRead MoreThe Vietnam War Was A Tragic Part Of The United States1465 Words   |  6 PagesP.O.W/M.I.A.s of the Vietnam War The Vietnam War was a tragic part of the United States’ history that to this day holds a great deal of mystery and a lack of information. It was an unpopular war, taking place from 1955 to 1975, with surmountable losses on each side. Forty years later, the consequences of the Vietnam War are still prevalent in the side effects of Agent Orange, post-traumatic stress disorder of soldiers, and the national debt. Though those are significant problems, the biggest influenceRead More American Pirsoners Of War In Vietnam Essay2216 Words   |  9 Pages Prisoners of War (POWs): In international law, term used to designate incarcerated members of the armed forces of an enemy, or noncombatants who render them direct service and who have been captured during wartime.1 nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;This definition is a very loose interpretation of the meaning of Prisoners of War (POWs). POWs throughout history have received harsh and brutal treatment. Prisoners received everything from torture to execution. However, in recent times efforts have been

Permanent International Human Resource Management

Question: Discuss about the Permanent International Human Resource Management. Answer: Introduction: The benefits of the contract employees are; they can be hired for just a shorter time period when an employee is absent in an organization and also a good method to test fresh employees. They also provide temporary solution to the business. While, hiring a contract employee gives rise in the cost of the organization and also a lot of time is wasted on training. There are also various legal problems of making the same contract employee work in an organization for many times (Neil, Chin, 2012). The pros of permanent employees are that time can be saved in the training procedure and also stability can be maintained in the organization. In the negative, it can be said that the permanent employees have restricted earning capability and also deficiency of flexibility, as they fail to maintain a work-life balance (Harzing, Pinnington, 2015). References: Galarneau, D. (2005).Earnings of temporary versus permanent employees(1st ed.). [Ottawa?]: Statistics Canada. Harzing, A., Pinnington, A. (2015).International human resource management(1st ed.). London: SAGE Publications Ltd. Neil, I., Chin, D. (2012).The Modern Contract of Employment(1st ed.). Sydney, A: Thomson Reuters.

Violence In Entertainment And Its Effect On Societ Essay Example For Students

Violence In Entertainment And Its Effect On Societ Essay yViolence In Entertainment And Its Effect On SocietyDoes entertainment influence societys attitude towards violent behavior? In order to fully answer this question we must first understand what violence is. Violence is the use of ones powers to inflict mental or physical injury upon another, examples of this would be rape or murder. Violence in entertainment reaches the public by way of television, movies, plays, and novels. Through the course of this essay it will be proven that violence in entertainment is a major factor in the escalation of violence in society, once this is proven we will take all of the evidence that has been shown throughout this paper and come to a conclusion as to whether or not violence in entertainment is justified and whether or not it should be censored. Television with its far reaching influence spreads across the globe. Its most important role is that of reporting the news and maintaining communication between people around the world. Televisions most in fluential, yet most serious aspect is its shows for entertainment. Violent childrens shows like Mighty Morphin Power Rangers and adult shows like NYPD Blue and Homicide almost always fail to show human beings being able to resolve their differences in a non-violent manner, instead they show a reckless attitude that promotes violent action first with reflection on the consequences later. In one episode of NYPD Blue three people were murdered in the span of an hour. Contemporary television creates a seemingly insatiable appetite for amusement of all kinds without regard for social or moral benefits (Schultze 41). Findings over the past twenty years by three Surgeon Generals, the Attorney Generals Task Force on Family Violence, the American Medical Association, the National Institute of Mental Health, the American Psychiatric Association, the American Psychological Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and other medical authorities indicate that televised violence is harmful to all of us, but particularly to the mental health of children (Medved 70-71). In 1989 the results of a five year study by the American Psychological Association indicated that the average child has witnessed 8,000 murders and 100,000 other acts of violence on television by the time he or she has completed sixth grade. In further studies it was determined that by the time that same child graduates from high school he or she will have spent 22,000 hours watching television, twice as many hours as he or she has spent in school (Bruno 124). We will write a custom essay on Violence In Entertainment And Its Effect On Societ specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now In a study by the Centers for Disease Control, published by the JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association), it was shown that homicide rates had doubled between the introduction of television in the 1950s and the end of the study in 1994. In that same study other possible causes for the vast increases in violence were studied, the baby boom effect, trends in urbanization, economic trends, trends in alcohol abuse, the role of capital punishment, civil unrest, the availability of guns, and exposure to television(Lamson 32). Each of these purported causes was tested in a variety of ways to see whether it could be eliminated as a credible contributor to doubling the crime rate in the United States, and one by each of them was invalidated, except for television. Children average four hours of television per day, and in the inner city that increases to as much as eleven hours a day, with an average of eight to twelve violent incidents per hour. It is also interesting to note that v iolence occurs some fifty-five times more often on television than it does in the real world (Medved 156). FBI and census data show the homicide arrest rate for seventeen-year-olds more than doubled between 1985 and 1991, and the rates for fifteen-and sixteen-year-olds increased even faster. Movies also add their fair share to the problem of violence in society. Researchers have established that copycat events are not an anomaly. Statistically-speaking, they are rare, but predictable, occurences. Television shows, novels, but especially movies-all can trigger copycat violence (Medved 72). As recently as November of 1995, New York City officials believed that the burning of a toll-booth clerk was a result of copycat violence, resulting from a similar scene in the movie Money Train. In 1994, Nathan Martinez shot and killed his stepmother and half sister after watching the movie Natural Born Killers at least six times. Later, Martinez, who had shaved his head and wore granny sun glasse s like Natural Born Killers main character Mickey Knox, reportedly told a friend, Its nothing like the movies(Purtell 57). In a 1993 film, The Program, there was a scene showing college football players lying in the center of a highway in an attempt to show their courage and dedication to their sport. This movie was later blamed for inspiring real-life imitators; (one of whom died). In numorous experiments based at pre-schools, researchers have observed children playing before and after seeing violent movies and television shows. Following the violent program the childrens play is invaribly more aggressive. They are much more likely to hit, punch, kick, and grab to get their way. In other words, violent entertainment teaches children how to use aggression for personal gain (Medved 75). It is also hard to believe that movies like Rambo III with one hundred and six killings and Terminator 2 which showed countless killings plus a nuclear holocaust have at one time had their own line of childrens action figures even though both movies are rated R. One must seriously consider the idea that the movie studios are targeting a younger and easily influenced main audience. The ancient Greeks believed t..hat violence should never be shown on stage, because people imitated what they saw. Because of this they would only show the results of violence in order to deter any violent activity. The Greeks slowly but surely moved away from this idea as did other playwrights, and by the late 1500s a new writer with a new view on violence was beginning to write plays. His name was William Shakespeare. Many critics were bothered by Shakespeares failure to follow the rules of the ancient Greeks, especially the rules concerning violence, but they also objected to Shakespeares comic sexual passages, which they considered vulgar. Shakespeare was a writer during what has historically been called the Elizabethan era. Shakespeares plays reflect the shift from optimism to pessimism in Elizabe than society. Elizabethans were keenly aware of death and the brevity of life (Info Find), but death and violence fascinated the Elizabethans. They flocked to the beheadings of traitors whose heads were exhibited on poles and watched as criminals were hanged, and they saw the rotting corpses dangle from the gallows for days (The Student Handbook 2: 591). Elizabethans, literature and lives were very violent. In Shakespeares play Hamlet all the main characters die through murder or suicide, all of which is shown on stage. Those critics who say excessive violence has only become a common occurence in todays entertainment, should watch Shakespeares Titus Andronicus with its stage direction, Enter a messenger with two heads and a hand (Klavan 98), or they should watch as quarts of stage blood are poured all over the victims in that same play. .u12cf1880074ba9203f1b8ac088e100a4 , .u12cf1880074ba9203f1b8ac088e100a4 .postImageUrl , .u12cf1880074ba9203f1b8ac088e100a4 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u12cf1880074ba9203f1b8ac088e100a4 , .u12cf1880074ba9203f1b8ac088e100a4:hover , .u12cf1880074ba9203f1b8ac088e100a4:visited , .u12cf1880074ba9203f1b8ac088e100a4:active { border:0!important; } .u12cf1880074ba9203f1b8ac088e100a4 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u12cf1880074ba9203f1b8ac088e100a4 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u12cf1880074ba9203f1b8ac088e100a4:active , .u12cf1880074ba9203f1b8ac088e100a4:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u12cf1880074ba9203f1b8ac088e100a4 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u12cf1880074ba9203f1b8ac088e100a4 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u12cf1880074ba9203f1b8ac088e100a4 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u12cf1880074ba9203f1b8ac088e100a4 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u12cf1880074ba9203f1b8ac088e100a4:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u12cf1880074ba9203f1b8ac088e100a4 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u12cf1880074ba9203f1b8ac088e100a4 .u12cf1880074ba9203f1b8ac088e100a4-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u12cf1880074ba9203f1b8ac088e100a4:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: My Extraordinary Adventures EssayNovels, just like television, movies, and plays can cause violence. Throughout history novels have been the cause of violent behavior. Those who say people cant be influenced by books, should really look into the influence that a book called Uncle Toms Cabin had ten years prior to the Civil War. In 1851 Uncle Toms Cabin, written by Harriet Beecher Stowe was published. The novel told of the hardships and cruelties faced by African-American slaves in the south. The novel popularlized the abolitionist movement and is believed to have been a major cause for the Civil War, which even though a noble cause, resulted in over 500,000 deaths (The Stu dent Handbook 2: 592). In 1980 Mark Chapman, a former mental patient, shot and killed John Lennon. When asked why he did it, he indicated that he got the idea to kill Lennon from J.D. Salingers novel The Catcher in the Rye (590). He felt that he and the main character in the story, Holden Caufield, were very similar because they were both angry social outcasts, who were recovering from a mental breakdown (590). Violence is prominent in childrens novels too. R.L. Stines novel The Babysitter III, tells of decapitating a baby and in Christopher Pikes novel, Monster, there is a graphic description of the effects of a shotgun being fired at a persons head at close range. Roderick McGillis, a professor of English at the University of Calgary and author of a book on childrens literature, has written that, What disturbs me is that were developing in our culture, in our cities, a kind of siege mentality. A lot of thes books reinforce this, make it sort of normal to think that the world is a place in which violence can erupt at any moment (Gray 54). With all of this evidence it is hard to ignore the fact that violence in entertainment can cause violence in society. This paper has now shown that there are copycat kilers who get the idea for their crimes from entertainment. It has also been shown that the more violent movies and television children watch the more likely thay are to become aggressive and violent. Violence in entertainment and society is not isolated to the present, it was also very prominent in the writings of Shakespeare. With the evidence showing that violence in entertainment causes real life violence, it is very hard to say that violence in entertainment is justifiable. When little children and adults alike, fall victim to entertainments violent influence it is not justifiable and it is especially not justifiable when violent entertainment creates real life victims. Is censorship the answer to the problem of violent entertainment? Should we tell people what they can or cant read or watch? The simple answer to this question is no, we cant censor violent entertainment. The First Amendment clearly states that: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise therof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people to peaceably assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. The instinct to censor is the tragic flaw of utopian minds. Our first job, said Plato in his classic attack on the democratic system , is to oversee the work of the story writers, and to accept any good stories they write, but reject the others (Klavan 96). If the government ever did censor violent entertainment who knows where they would stop, or even if they would. Perhaps they would try to censor violent speech or try to censor the speech of those who disagreed with the ac tions of the government. The simple message is dont promote censorship, because it could easily get out of hand, and as the old saying goes the road to hell is paved with good intentions. There are then only two ways to get rid of the violent entertainment in our lives: we could shame those who make the violent movies, television shows, books, and plays, into having a social conscience, making them be less prone to creating violent entertainment; or we could simply solve the problem ourselves, with a push of a button, or the turn of a page.